Examining Proposition 21

teen courts be a recent phenomenon (dating only to 1899) because the notion of a upstart is recent. The perspective of "child" did not exist for most of history. Children were property until they reached progress five or six. After reaching that age, the child had to performance according to the aforesaid(prenominal) mandates as adults. The state punished them same(p) adults.

Juvenile courts replaced that philosophy with a belief in refilling and treatment. Youthful indiscretions should not haunt a person forever. Those under a certain age should not be held to the same standard as adults. "Generally, the idea of young law is that children do not have the maturity to grasp the import of evility, and, thus, takeenders are more in need of rehabilitation than incarceration" (The Bakersfield Californian). fit in to the authors of Proposition 21, that philosophy suited a simpler era. These days, however, changes are infallible to insure public safety.

Backers of Proposition 21 state their justification in the initiative's findings and declarations. While the overall crime rate has declined, juvenile arrests for serious crimes grew by 46 percent from 1983 to 1992, according to the U.S. section of Justice. Similarly, the California Department of Justice reported a 54 percent increase in juvenile arrests for violent crimes mingled with 1986 and 1995 (California Se

According to the initiative's authors, street gangs bond a substantial threat to public safety. Moreover, the authors claim that time new laws (such as the Three Strikes Law) have succeeded in minify the crime rate, "[v]iolent juvenile crime has proven most wicked to this positive trend." This problem of youth and gang violence allow for only increase as California's population of young citizenry continues its rapid growth, as predicted (California Secretary of State).

2000): www.mercurycenter.com/opinion/ election/prop21.htm.

Beres, Linda S., and Griffith, doubting Thomas D.

"Did 'Three Strikes'

In addition, the code is amended so that juvenile criminal records volition no longer be expunged and so that juvenile defendants will no longer automatically be released to their parents unfinished trial. The proposition also expands the use of prior offenses in devising determinations of whether a juvenile defendant should be removed to premium Court (California Secretary of State).

. "Crack Down on Juvenile Crime." The Bakersfield

Third, the decision of whether to try a juvenile should not be based on politics. Proposition 21, however, insures that will be the slipperiness by vesting prosecutors with the power to make this decision. District attorneys face election every four years. They want to appear tough on crime. Inevitably, political considerations will play a part in this decision, so it is best left to judges, who are subject to fewer political pressures (they only face election every 12 years). Moreover, judges are supposed to make tough calls (San Jose quicksilver News).

Third, Proposition 21 works on the same belief as the Three Strikes Law. It addresses habitual offenders, and by keeping them off the streets for longer periods, society will be safer because they will not be able to commit more crimes and because police will be able to direct their resources elsewhere (The Bakersfield Californian).

Finally, while it seems that the backers of Propos
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!