The U.S. Distribution of Power

Their attitude is that the raft ar meant to be manipulated and lied to in order to gain the sight's support, money, and votes. This exercise and lying and corruption on the part of creation and close sources in the country (media, sexual relation, invade groups, corporations, chairperson, etc.) The people generally do non even know they are being manipulated, or they become cynical and apathetic after they see how low-powered they are.

Again, the value of a democracy in terms of nicety is measured in terms of the power held by the people whom the democracy is supposed to serve. Janda, cull and Goldman seem to entreat that the public has more power than it once had because of the growth of public flavour polls: "Before polling became an accepted part of the Ameri commode scene, politicians, journalists, and everyone else could argue about what 'the people' demanded, merely no one really knew" (Janda, Berry & Goldman, 1982, 151). The same authors suggest that now that politicians know how the people want with respect to important issues, they can be more responsive to those desires. However, this conclusion is based on a number of assumptions which slew the facts of political power distribution in the United States. For example, the pouch of public opinion was in favor of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, but the bulk of the American people were ignorant of the direct eccentric the United States had played in building Iraq up militarily and even in failing to disc

The professorship is clearly the single most powerful somebody in the government, but his power is severely limited by both the Constitution and by the practical realities of dealing with Congress, with political party politics, and trying to balance the ask and demands of the numerous and powerful interest groups. Clearly, the President has the power to set a legislative docket based on what he sees as the central needs and values of the nation, but he must be open to bow the Congress and the people of the rightness and the practicality of his agendum. The success of both President in terms of exercising the power gettable to him depends on this ability to persuade.

The problem with this exercise in nonion is that it more often has to do with arm-twisting and political favors and promises than with values related to to the good of citizens and the country. As Neustadt writes in Cigler and Loomis,

The time and energy of the President are, therefore, so taken up by the need to persuade and manipulate powerful interests in and out of government that it is miniscule surprise that he has time to care about the millions of people who have little to offer him in the way of power. The President can be so concerned with getting his agenda passed by Congress and implemented by the bureaucracy that he is in danger of losing contact with what the people want. For example, President Clinton has struggled so long and hard with Congress over the medical straighten plan that he has left the people confused as to what the plan actually is all about. How much power can the people have in this process if the President and Congress are too busy fighting with one another(prenominal) to explain the issue to the people? If the people do not understand the issue, they can have no real power in making policy. Unfortunately, the complexity of issues in every sphere---economics, kind reform, foreign policy---is so great today that it is difficult if not impossible for the people to understand the issues well
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!