White Collar Crime

Running Head : WHITE COLLAR CRIME[The Writer s reference][The Name of the Institution] IntroductionThere is more or lessthing or so the phenomenon of skilled abuse that always seems to invite a comparison with other types of crime especially accomplished seat and violent crimes . When top executives are convicted of fraud in the savings and loan industry , we wonder what would happen to bank robbers who divert from the same institutions . On the rare occasions when corporate roughshods go to prison , we wonder for how long and in which institutions they will do their time--in comparison with conventional criminals . There is always a delaying suspicion that the white-collar criminal is getting off laxly in our referee system . This ongoing comparison factor that when we learn something about white-collar crime , we are at the same time learning something about other kinds of crime and criminal arbiter . In this respect , an awareness of white-collar crime and how we formally handle it encourages us to think critically about the reputation of crime , law , and criminal justiceIn an early analysis of white-collar crime , criminologist Donald Newman (1958 : 56 ) recognized some of theoretical implications of the sentiment of white-collar crime . He observed that whether criminologists like it or not , they must come to toll with issues of power and permit when they study white-collar crime . This includes examining the role of power and wealthiness in shaping the law : Why are some behaviors criminalized and others not ? And , conversely , why and how is it that some highly dubitable organizational practices are legalized ? It also challenges us to think about inequalities in the administration of justice : Why do we contain the apparent double standard in how we respond to conventional crime versus white-collar crime ? Why do we allocate more resources to pursuing some crimes than others ?

These and other questions are radical to understanding all crime , but they are do more explicit when we take note of white-collar crime , particularly the crimes of the wealthy and powerful in societySteven Box (1983 : 12-15 ) mum this when he wrote of the mystification of our perceptions of crime , where he argued that we are fundamentally socialized to see crime through the eyes of the render . In this legal definition of the crime problem , the crimes of the worthless are highlighted and made the focus of the investigative efforts of the criminal justice system . 2 Through this same legal crystalline lens of the state the crimes of the powerful are concealed or obscured from spatial relation . Thinking about white-collar crime in these terms means that we must demystify our perceptions of this official view of crimeTwo widely shared myths provide ideological support to conventional view about the crime problem . One of these myths , the myth of the criminal type , sensitizes us to the kinds of persons who are criminals as well as to their social location in society . The other myth , the myth of the law-abiding citizen , reassures the rest of us that we are advantageously different from those...If you want to get a full essay, decree it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper