Compare And Contrast Plato With Machiavelli On The Relationship Between The Ethics Of The Soul And The Ethics Of Politics Using `the Prince` And `the Trial And Death Of Socrates`

Politics is the art of ruling for the benefit of the people . It implies former and power needs to find al mavenification and arguments to support it This is wherefore at that place has unceasingly been a connexion between judicature and the principles of moralistic philosophy , no look if the latter ones back up the occasion or if they stood in contradiction with it . This concentrates on the kinship between the ethics of soul and that of politics in the whole kit of Machiavelli , The Prince and Plato s The exertion and death of Socrates . The similarities and the differences between the conceptions of the two authors atomic number 18 revealed with an reason psychology of the concept of virtue and its connection to the psyche s rejoicing and the surface being of the submit in the works that were mentioned aboveBoth Plato and Machiavelli atomic number 18 concerned with the s dear being of the cite and the relationship between the put up and the separate . The conception regarding the status of the individual is nevertheless distinct in their works . While Plato tries to stress that it is always break to be fitting than unjust , claiming that there is a ironlike connection between justice , individualised happiness and the well being of the state , Machiavelli underlines the f profess that moral principles are non necessarily connected with the efficiency of the act of ruling . If the principles of piety and justice need to be depressed in for the state to be prosperous , than this is how things must be done . The lowest dissolve becomes an excuse for the means that are required in the process .

This is in fact the predicament that is to be shew in The Prince : how is one supposed to realize justice and morality when a just and moral purpose is to be served through immoral and unjust meansOn the other paw , Plato establishes a connection between the state and the soul of the individual , considering justice as a virtue that is to be nominate in some(prenominal) these dimensions . The dilemma that occurs in The trail and death of Socrates is proving that it is always , disregarding of the circumstances , better to act in a just manner . The decision of Socrates to obey the jurisprudence , eventide if that meant last , is a strong illustration of the conception regarding the regard for the righteousness and what is just . Both Plato and Machiavelli consider that the individuals need the state as a form of organization that is indispensable for their excerption and well beingAccording to Plato , the city (the state ) includes the individuals . Thus a just city automatically means happy individuals . Every citizen , no matter his status must respect the law . dismission against the law means doing wrong to the city and thus to its citizens . Socrates believes that the closely worthful possession of an individual is not a physical one , but his own soul Wealth does not stick about excellence , but excellence makes wealth and everything else good for men , both individually and collectively (Plato , 33...If you fatality to vanquish a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper